Browse By

Ann Barnhardt on the vast and sudden acceptance of the abuse of the posterior fundament

Strong language and adult themes warning.
We’re going to talk about what homosexual acts really are, so read this after the kids have gone to bed. Ann’s choice of language here is deliberate. Just to head off the expected criticism: it is not “pornographic” but merely factually, one might say, medically descriptive. I have long been arguing that one of the reasons there is such a vast acceptance of the “nice gay men” movement is that no one is willing to actually talk clearly about what they do.

The homosexualist ideological movement has been very, very careful to make sure they restrict their rhetoric to being about “love” and “rights” and never, ever mention the gruesome realities in the “polite company” of the straight world they are attempting to evangelize. What is very commonly talked about in their own world, in their magazines and websites, is in public carefully shrouded. But I have read homosexual literature, and folks, they’re a LOT more … straightforward among their own constituents than Ann has been here.

When Ann and I talked about putting this article on WUWTS, we briefly worried about how people would react. But this isn’t the Remnant, and it isn’t LifeSiteNews. And this is an emergency, so it’s time for all the special snowflakes to grow up, and quick.

Right now, the men in Rome who are attempting to move the Church towards acceptance of sodomy know full well that if they talked about what they’re really talking about, the Catholic world would recoil in horror. The whole thing would be over in an hour.

But they won’t. So we have to.



Internet porn: the 900-pound gorilla in the Synod’s closet

As the person whose vocation it is to say and explain things, oftentimes horrific things, in clear, blunt terms, I have been asked to explain to the readership demographic of WUWTS why it is that everyone in post-Christian, post-Western civilization seems to be so completely comfortable with the sodomite milieu.

Just a couple of decades ago, pretty much everyone was in agreement that homosexuality and sodomitical acts were nausea-inducing in their odiousness, repellent on every level, the merest sight or of even hint of which was so shocking  that every fiber of one’s being would recoil in disgust: the quintessential manifestation of the Natural Law, so strong that it involved both the disruption of the digestive tract and the fight-or-flight endocrine response.

Just a couple of decades before that, it was not at all uncommon for people in the Christian world to live their entire lives never knowing that the sins of Sodom even existed on earth.  The notion of two men or two women copulating was so evil, so hellish, so incomprehensible to the relatively uncorrupted human mind that many, many people were spared even the knowledge of it.

And so to today.  How is it that today, not only is the average person fully aware of the panoply of sodomitical acts, but completely comfortable with them to the point of declaring them equal, if not superior, to the proper conjugal act?

The answer is pornography.

[HJMW: Porn Sites Get More Visitors Each Month Than Netflix, Amazon And Twitter Combined. 30% of the Internet industry is pornography.]

And here is where the “WardCleaverLet’sStepIntoMyDenAndHaveATalk” dynamic comes in.

Unless you have done a lot of research, you all out there in Traddyland probably have no idea how pervasive pornography is today. It is everywhere. And it is monstrously graphic. And in internet porn, there is a huge emphasis on the use of the misuse of the posterior fundament. Natural sexual relations have become passe in the porn world, possibly because it is too close to the real moral purpose of sex.

The sheer number of people who are watching pornography on a daily basis – hours upon hours per week, and many per day, via the internet, is staggering.  It is probably not unreasonable to adopt the assumption that anyone you meet or encounter in today’s society between the ages of 12, yes twelve, and 70, consumes pornography regularly.

And Traddyland isn’t immune. In fact, I have heard multiple FSSP priests report that the number one grave issue they hear about in the confessional is pornography, both from men and increasingly for women as well. We all know that men are designed to be far more visually-oriented in their sexual response mechanisms.  I heard a description of the power of pornographic images on a man as an almost drugged sensation wherein the man felt almost completely powerless to look away from an image that popped up on his computer screen one day while doing research. The man reported going from one inadvertent glance at an obscene still image to full-blown addiction to streaming video of sodomitical acts within a matter of a few days.

Children, in their immaturity, curiosity and hormonal flux, are obviously easy targets.  And even women become addicted as they initially look at pornography in order to see what men consider attractive or sexy, but then quickly fall into the same trap of being stimulated by the sight of the obscene acts themselves, requiring ever-more depravity in order to become aroused.

Now we need to talk about something extremely foul, so please shut the door and make sure the kids aren’t looking.

Why are people today – heterosexual people – so comfortable with sodomitical acts?  Why are they completely fine with the notion of Kevin inserting his erect penis into the feces-laden rectal vault of Brad and using Brad’s posterior fundament as the point of masturbatory friction?

Here’s a little note from a health organisation, (Christian) warning about this activity in similarly factual terms:

Men having sex with other men leads to greater health risks than men having sex with women1 not only because of promiscuity but also because of the nature of sex among men. A British researcher summarizes the danger as follows:

“Male homosexual behaviour is not simply either ‘active’ or ‘passive,’ since penile-anal, mouth-penile, and hand-anal sexual contact is usual for both partners, and mouth-anal contact is not infrequent. . . . Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence of diseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma may encourage the entry of micro-organisms and thus lead to primary syphilitic lesions occurring in the anogenital area. . . In addition to sodomy, trauma may be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile adornments, and prostheses.”

So, why do so many people think that something so utterly foul and evil as man-on-man anal sodomy could ever, ever be analogized to, much less declared a form of Holy Matrimony?

The reason is because anal sex is by far the “preferred” sex act in heterosexual pornography.  Yes, that’s right, HETEROsexual.  Anal sex has been propagandized as the ultimate, most pleasure-filled male-female sex act, with oral sodomy second, manual sodomy third, and vaginal intercourse a distant fourth.  The anal sphincter is billed in today’s pornographic culture as being better able to bear down on the penis, and the rectal vault as “tighter” than the vagina. This information may not be available directly from the internet, but again, pop culture, particularly “gangster” rap culture accepts it as obvious and once again, it is openly talked about in the homosexual subculture’s own material

This propagandization is not limited to the domain of explicit pornography.  Turn on your television and know that every time you see a Miley Cyrus or Beyonce or a Kardashian bending over at the waist, turning around, or generally accentuating in any way the buttocks, what that is advertising is anal sodomy. Most “dancing” seen today in the popular music milieu revolves around depicting anal sodomy.

Additionally, anal sex is pushed in schools (often under the guise of “anti-bullying” campaigns by gay lobbyists invited directly into the schools by government) and through doctors and abortuaries as a “natural” method of contraception.  It is pushed on women by telling them that not only will their husbands/boyfriends find it more pleasurable, but it will guarantee both partners that pregnancy will not result.

And so, the reason why the post-Christian West is now almost completely devoid of the natural, intense revulsion at sodomitical acts, that should be the last line of defense against this malignant cancer upon humanity, is because they have been desensitized to it via pornography, which they are consuming at a staggering rate. As a result, many heterosexuals are now engaging in anal sodomy themselves, and thus see no problem with homosexual acts of sodomy.

And while the farce that is the Synod Against the Family continues in Rome, and such topics as female “ordination” and “the injustice of economic inequality” continue to come up, nary a word is said about pornography, which is and continues to be the main delivery vector for the poison used to murder Christian Civilization.

I wonder why.


69 thoughts on “Ann Barnhardt on the vast and sudden acceptance of the abuse of the posterior fundament”

  1. Camilla Cameo says:

    Overall, a great and true article, but one thing makes no sense to me.

    If all dance moves and pinup-style shots of women focusing on their butts are really about the promise of sodomy, why am I, a heterosexual virgin woman who has never seen any porn, tempted to lust by the sight of the butts of handsome men in well-fitting clothes? I certainly do not wish to sodomize them; that is disgusting to me and not even possible. What I am tempted to desire is actual, normal sex with them; which wouldn’t particularly involve the butt, but still, a fit and flatteringly-panted male posterior allures me toward such desires. Couldn’t it be that the butt of a shapely woman might allure men toward normal, real sex as well, not just sodomy?

    Also, were the pinup images of the forties that focused on women’s butts about sodomy? If so, that kind of contradicts the premise that there is this post-Sexual Revolution mainstreaming now as described in the article.

  2. Lizzaanne O Leary says:

    Who is that dude pawing Pope Francis?

  3. Lizzaanne O Leary says:

    Call that explicit? You need to listen to Gail Dines.

  4. craig says:

    Second the recommendation for OpenDNS.

    Also, if you want to defeat both the temptations that plague male and female (yes, despite the lies and delusions of modern feminist “churchianity”, women are sinners too), have each spouse enter one-half of the password (and not tell the other what it is).

  5. Chris Mulcahy says:

    Rarely do I see a psychological argument against porn. And this applies to premarital sex. Apparently brain chemistry immediately begins to be altered by overt sexual activity of any kind. Easy to argue that this is a normal condition that promotes pair-bonding, resulting in intact marriages. Bottom line: deviant sexual activity of any kind damages the brain and threatens lifelong sexual dysfunction. You hurt yourself.

  6. Ab illo bene dicáris says:

    I vocalize my requests to the BVM during Rosary. I sometimes ask for the complete annihilation of the porn industry and the conversion of those who work in it. Two birds. One stone.

  7. Janet says:

    Harvey Milk addressed a NAMBLA conference where he encouraged parents to give their sons “access” to more “mature” gay men. Gee…wonder why?!?!?!

  8. Janet says:

    OpenDNS is a pretty good way to do it, too. If you set that up on the router itself, every device in the home that uses it is protected.

  9. Janet says:

    Which would make sense, given that the average age of first exposure to porn, at least for boys, is before they’re even physically old enough to sire a child…

  10. Janet says:

    Hence 50 Shades. A friend of mine used to work in a bookstore, and women would literally buy that trash and a Bible in the same transaction.

  11. Janet says:

    I was born in the early 80s, and with AIDS, we were hit again and again with stories of kids who got it from blood transfusions, (I actually had a good friend this happened to,) and how the guy who DONATED the blood got it was never discussed.

  12. John says:

    “When the Son of Man returns, it will be like it was in Noah’s day.” Matthew 24:37

    Hmm, so what was going on in the ‘days of Noah’?

    …is not this written in the book of JASHER? Joshua 10:12-14

    … behold, it is written in the book of JASHER. 2 Samuel 1:17-18

    And Lamech, the son of Methusael, became related to Cainan by marriage, and he took his two daughters for his wives, and Adah conceived and bare a son to Lamech, and she called his name Jabal. And she again conceived and bare a son, and called his name Jubal; and Zillah, her sister, was barren in those days and had no offspring. For in those days the sons of men began to trespass against God, and to transgress the commandments which he had commanded to Adam, to be fruitful and multiply in the earth. And some of the sons of men caused their wives to drink a draught that would render them barren, in order that they might retain their figures and whereby their beautiful appearance might not fade. And when the sons of men caused some of their wives to drink, Zillah drank with them. And the child-bearing women appeared abominable in the sight of their husbands as widows, whilst their husbands lived, for to the barren ones only they were attached. Book of Jasher 2:17-22

    Drum roll . . . and the MOTHER of the 900 lb. gorilla is CONTRACEPTION.

  13. catholicguy says:

    Good one.

  14. Sur Veilled says:

    Ann B.’s discussion of the diabolical power of pornography here is important and hits the target. In respect to this issue of the normalization of “the abuse of the posterior fundament”, I would add that this has been a deliberate, carefully constructed, mercilessly implemented conspiracy for decades. Those who are not familiar with “THE OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA” article by Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill (a.k.a. Hunter Madsen) in 1987 should see: , or wherever you can find it by searching the name. It was a seminal work in a publication patronized only by their own kind. It is horrifically prophetic.

    The perverts are not even close to finished. They have come for your children, in absolutely every sense of that expression. While now they quibble and bark in UN meetings about education and sexual freedom for children, you will soon find it to be a hate crime to disallow “your” own children from relations with whoever they wish.

    The Pied Piper of Hamlet was more merciful.

  15. dbwheeler says:

    I agree. I hate what sin has done in my own life! Without the incredible gifts of confession, repentance and forgiveness the sheer weight of darkness and error is simply unbearable. Mr Brown has lost his way and his own will to choose. As Frank Sheed writes, it’s insanity.

  16. Martha says:

    I did get your post, Gladstone-thank you!-I just wanted a confirmation of your opinion so that I wasn’t misunderstanding you. I use my phone as well- such a pain!

  17. rosearbor says:

    Nothing is more starkly emblematic of Satan’s contempt for humanity than the grotesqueness of a heterosexual couple aping homosexual behavior — and this includes oral as well as anal sex. Women and girls have been pressured for years now to perform the former; our culture has been telling them that this ultimate humiliation is basic to sexual desirability, and that sexual desirability is basic to being loved. Permanent nightmare.

  18. Kimberly says:

    Didn’t you delete your original comment? Also, you use terms like “all boys catholic college” and expect your story to be taken seriously. I’ve never heard anyone use the term “all boys” when speaking about a college before. Your comment sounds like it was written by a teenager or twenty something with little to no knowledge of catholic doctrine or social culture, who is doing a poor job of repeating some feminist propaganda she once read.

  19. T. Audrey Glamour says:

    I wonder what Muslims think about anal sex…?

  20. T. Audrey Glamour says:

    We are being told that same sex attracted people are killing themselves because they are being bullied and made to feel bad, not because they have mental problems. After all, they just wanna be loved.say it often enough and it becomes true.

  21. sunshineinjuly says:

    Kimberly are you off your meds again girl? Who said that they wanted 15 kids? Not me, fool! I merely stated the fact that women have at least 30 years of child bearing years and no way can most women endure or even pay for that scene…and further have a man stick by her side. As for your more moronic statement…is the husband the moron? Yep indeed, for he did in FACT say…no more sex if you can’t have babies…he was taught by german priests at an all boy’s catholic college that the only reason for sex was to have babies….and that dear heart is a steaming pile of you know. So if Kimberly can’t understand English or she prefers to put a stupid spin on another’s experience, does that make her a moron….sane minds would concur it’s moronic to assume.

  22. Barbara says:

    Sorry, wrong. It’s not getting the faggotry out of the priesthood that will save souls it’s getting GOD back into the minds and hearts of Catholics.

  23. Richard W Comerford says:

    Mr. Doug Brown:

    You posted in part: “same sex sex, ( which incidentally between great friends becomes something meaningful and beautiful”

    Friends do not bugger friends. The act of sodomy is a serious or mortal sin. One of the four sins which “cry to heaven to vengeance”. Why tempt God?

    God bless

    Richard W Comerford

  24. Lynda says:

    Pornography is evil – and those engaging in it are committing moral evil that destroys their moral soul, and causes harm to those they interact with.

  25. Lynda says:

    Imagining yourself having sex with women you see pictured is morally wrong – it is already to commit fornication or adultery. Lust must be controlled, and overcome.

  26. Lynda says:

    Of course pornography is often passed off as “art”.

  27. Lynda says:

    As much evil as possible.

  28. Lynda says:

    He ought to have been thrown out. What offence to God and abuse of Holy Orders. Lord, save us!

  29. Lynda says:

    It was in almost all Christian countries. It still sits – generally unenforced – on the law books of some. Laws against indecency were almost universal.

  30. Louise says:

    I think women like reading it more than looking at it.

  31. Louise says:

    No no. Fine art =/= porn.

  32. Louise says:

    Gee. Have we had any atheists commenting on the other posts on this website? I think not. They must really think porn is awesome. (And perverted sex as well).

  33. MunichMan says:

    For most good men, pornography is the unfortunate first step. It breaks down natural modesty and the desire to be chaste, especially in adolescents. The perceived need to escape responsibility for sex drives the market for artificial contraception by both men and women. Artificial contraception is a significant enabler, however, pornography almost always precedes it.

  34. Asbury Fox says:

    Nowhere in the article does it say that porn will turn heterosexual people gay. It says that watching porn will leady many to embrace and accept the act of sodomy. There is an agenda in leading people to accept the act. Heterosexual acceptance of anal sex does not mean heterosexual people are becoming gay, but that heterosexuals are embracing the act in their sexual unions. They therefore have no problem with the gay lifestyle and homosexuals engaging in the act. Heterosexuals see the act as normal and legitimate.

  35. Asbury Fox says:

    You just stated your own personal experience, and bravo for keeping the natural instinct of disgust for sodomy, but just because you are normal, does not make society as a whole normal, and therefore make this article stupid. The article is not stupid. You want to generalize for everybody your own experience, but unfortunately, more and more people are embracing the act of sodomy. They no longer have the disgust you, me, or other normal people should have about it. We are becoming outliers.

  36. Martha says:

    So, porn then? Shall I burn it in my fire pit a la the bonfire of the vanities?

  37. Jim J. McCrea says:

    Yes indeed – porn should be completely outlawed!

  38. stephen says:

    This week It struck me how pornography has not been mentioned in the synod. Your thoughts confirmed my own. I have to say I have moved beyond hate for these poor sodomites. They are tools of the devil and do suffer here on earth. God’s masterpiece:life, brought about by man and woman in the marital embrace. Satan’s work of mockery with 2 men bringing about death, disease and damnation. Thank God for your candor and truth. The photograph above should send chills to all Christians. Look at it, who does it appear is in charge? It is not a gesture of affection, it looks more like patronizing pity from the notorious sodomite brought into Rome to run the Vatican bank.

  39. Benton Marder says:

    There is reason to believe that Pope Francis might well become Petrus Romanus, the last Pope on the list of St Malachy the Prophet. Lachymose dies illa !

  40. Carlos_Perera says:

    That story is quite true. The Germans’ apology was, essentially, “You can’t really expect us to take all of that religion stuff into account when we’re looking for good business opportunities, now, can you?”

  41. BruceDeBrat says:

    Writing as one who has this crap in his immediate family, I will state bluntly that it is 100 percent destructive, 100 percent of the time. Insofar as pornography – the only safe method to protect yourselves in the age of internet is with a filtering system such as “K9” – Set the filters WITH your spouse, have your SPOUSE create the password, and then have your SPOUSE hide away that code (thus to defeat temptation). Another aspect is the ad and gaming “traps” that are now found on most e-mail servers, FB, Twitter, and just about every website, even conservative blogs. K-9 has a free download of their filtering program – Pray the TRADITIONAL Rosary every day, and may God help us all.

  42. Gladstone says:

    Pagan art glories in the naked human form. Botticelli like many others, was seized with remorse for the vanity in his art and life. He became an acolyte of Savonarola, a monk and reactionary against the immorality of Florence and the infamous Pope Alexander VI. The artist literally fueled the Bonfire of the Vanities.

    A thought arises as to the disordered desires which feed porn habits.
    An edifying sermon described the Roman understanding of happiness, which translates well into the Catholic, hierarchical view of the universe. 1. delectatum, a natural good and joy which is transitory, like the marital act. 2. laetare, a joy which is higher, but which can be lost, like being in the company of saintly Catholic friends. 3. Felicitatem, joy that never ends. The kind wherein one might taste in this life perhaps as a grace-bestowed lifting of the soul so happy that it lightens its hold on its mortal coil.

    We were made for supernatural joy. Fake-faggot-church wants to make bending over a sacrament. This is a direct consequence of the Modernists’ denial of Divine Revelation. Deny eternal joy and destiny, with its mystical rain falling occasionally to the faithful, and the only thing left to attain is a full stomach, drunken intellect, and genital stimulation. We poor sinners have fallen for the lie that perverse sexuality is a sort of gnostic shortcut to the highest level of happiness. Vox is right. This post is right. Expose these bastards and they’ll run like cockroaches.

  43. Robert Slanton says:

    I get it you Christians don’t like porn.

    However you always go overboard to ridiculous levels to argue against it, far beyond the realm of sanity. This article is a prime example of that.

    Its central argument is that looking at any porn will turn someone gay and has turned society gay.

    That claim is so ridiculously false, that these arguments just show how desperate Ann is to be relevant.

  44. standtall909 says:

    Ha!!! Of course they should be thrown in prison!!!! BUT……Pope Francis has hand picked Daneels to be a head honcho in this Synod to destroy the family. Daneels and others are a ‘protected lot’ that will not be touched.

  45. standtall909 says:

    If more people would just PRAY THE ROSARY even regularly if not DAILY they would be transformed.

  46. Margaret Costello says:

    What many people don’t realize is that porn act like dopamine on the brain, with repeated exposure turning you into a dope addict. It’s why people struggle to stop porn or masturbation b/c it’s just not a spiritual battle but a physical one. The withdrawal can be very intense and debilitating, much like heroin. A person has to be willing to do whatever it takes, endure whatever w/d symptoms that hit them, get major support and counseling, figure out why they exposed themselves and continue to do so, and surrender it all to God.

    I read somewhere that there are different mechanisms at play when self abuse happens versus natural intercourse i.e. ejaculations. The self abuse actually sets up addiction and functional brain damage whereas the natural intercourse does not. The good news is that the brain damage can be healed via going thru w/d, getting support via supplements, counseling and God’s grace. This is a drug addiction where we are our own personal crack pipes. It’s essential that children and adults be guarded from this plague. Porn should be outlawed asap.

    Thank you for this brutal yet true article Miss Barnhardt. God bless you:+)

  47. desafinado says:

    Great article, Ann! But imho you should have mentioned Marlon Brando and “Last Tango in Paris”, since that movie was very important in promoting heterosexual sodomy at a time when pornography wasn’t half as bad as now, or so easily accessible for everyone. A fan from Italy.

  48. Vox Cantoris says:

    O for heaven’s sake, would you get off of this “My Eminence” thing? Get the salutation correct. YOU are not the Cardinal. He is not “My Eminence!” It is HIS Eminence when referring to Him or Your Eminence when addressing him. It makes you look silly.

  49. @FMShyanguya says:

    Mysterium Iniquitatis. – Cf. 2 Thess 2:7
    Do not worry, they no longer know Latin, so they won’t know we are onto them …

  50. Kimberly says:

    One question. If the woman wanted the 15 kids, do you still think she is insane? Wait, I lied. Just one more question. If a man tells his 32 year old wife that there is no reason for him to have sex with her anymore because she can’t get pregnant any more, and the wife actually believes that is the reason he didn’t want sex with her any more – is the husband the moron?

  51. Julian Barkin says:

    Well, at least the group monitored by my Eminence, Thomas Cardinal Collins of the Archdiocese of Toronto, are starting to pointing the finger at this! From the circular group paper of English “D” here at

    “Our group thought there were a number of elements missing from the text: a serious reflection on gender ideology, more reflection on pastoral care for the differently-abled, the role of fathers and men as well as the role of women, and a deeper treatment of the destructive nature of pornography and other misuses of electronic technology.”

  52. Martha says:

    While we’re on the subject of porn, Ann, I wonder if you would advise me on the subject of art. I’ve come across very conflicting opinions on this, as you might imagine. I have a copy of Botticelli’s ‘Birth of Venus.’ Beautiful? Porn in disguise? What say you?

  53. Martha says:

    Nasty. Just nasty. I’ve always attributed the ‘bending over’ being sexy phenomenon to the, um, position from behind but using the proper orifice.

  54. Budvarakbar says:

    Ann’s thinking is NOT ‘clouded’ — it is very clear in fact!

  55. Patricia Gallagher says:

    I just finished reading what is available online of “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party.” first published in 1995 by Lively and Abrams and currently in its 5th edition. The parallels between conditions in Germany in the four decades of the 20th century and those in the United States from then to now are stunning and frightening. This is not just about “sexual preference.” It is the portrait of Satan seizing power.

  56. @FMShyanguya says:

    And there is the deterioration of mental their mental … suicides … and most important, the unrepentant just like unrepentant adulterers, do not inherit the Kingdom.

  57. johnhenry says:

    Mr Slanton: You have not said why you think this article is “just stupid”. You told us about your sexual preferences and your atheism and about what type of porn you don’t like, but you never actually explained why this article is “just stupid”.

    And what about this “world” Ms Barnhardt doesn’t understand she’s “losing”. What “world” is that exactly?

  58. S Conner says:

    Anne, you need to go to the fine blog Deus Ex Machina, and read this week’s posts for an understanding of GBD (gay bowel disease) that occurs because of chronic sodomy. And all of the other diseases more frequent among the sodomites.

    The author of this blog cites scientific studies that demonstrate the preponderance of various odious maladies among sodomites.

    You will very much appreciate the effort this gentleman has made to enlighten us.

  59. dbwheeler says:

    God allows those with reprobate hearts to harden as they become their sin until they are utterly defiled by their own obsession and will.
    Wouldst that you would all keep it amongst yourselves but oh no, you must force your vile depravity on everyone else and drag civilization into the cesspool with you. The Church isn’t in decline…just the perverted bishops and cardinals who continue to defile her day be day with their lies and evil natures. Frankly, I think they should be thrown in prison…especially Daneels.

  60. Vox Cantoris says:

    Excellent work Ann and Hilary. Pornography, masturbation, adultery, and other sins of heterosexuals prevents them from being opposed to sodomy and lesbianism. Doing so would mean they would be hypocrite and to that would be, in their minds, a greater “sin” if they only believed it. How many of these Roman priests working in the Vatican are faggots, practicing ones? How many cruise the “gay bars” or Rome nightly? How many feeds of porn on the servers? Ashley Madison actually had member at Well, they were at least, presumably, interested in women.

    What rot and what disgust these filthy bastards are, these faggots.

    Out them. Out every single one of them no matter what colour of cassock (if only) they wear.

  61. Doug Brown says:

    The Catholic Church isn’t just in decline, it’s ship-wrecked, and the real issue isn’t what poor Ann is so aghast about, same sex sex, ( which incidentally between great friends becomes something meaningful and beautiful, say some, and isn’t dirty at all, (read up on the massive butt cleaning rituals gay men practice) Alas, Ann’s sublime hatred clouds her thinking, but women do this, fixate.

  62. Robert Slanton says:

    I don’t know if this comment will be deleted or not, but I think its fair considering the content and subject matter of this article.

    I’m an athiest who enjoys seeing nude women, because I can imagine myself having hex with her.

    I have no desire whatsoever to watch “sodomitical acts”. I can’t even stand watching man on women porn because I don’t like seeing other men naked.

    If you gave me the chance the have “anal sex” with the most beautiful supermodel in the world, I would turn it down because I don’t go for this.

    This article is just stupid. You don’t even understand the world your losing.

  63. @FMShyanguya says:

    Porn … very evil … Satan really, really hates God, and therefore us, who God loves, since he instigates the vice that he himself, because of his angelic nature, finds repugnant.
    How do the men who want to do porn get to the porn “star” women? By doing men first …

  64. TheVeiledThreat says:

    I may be the only person I know who doesn’t view porn on the Internet. That’s scary!

    Back before the ‘net was heavily graphic (not talking porn here, just images in general) I downloaded a couple of porn images from USEnet, where people were sharing, just because they could. This was on a dial-up connection. They were zip files and had to be unpacked.

    I realized right away they were mostly aimed at homosexual men. Those involving women appeared to be from third world countries where these woman were performing because they were desperate for a livelihood. These were still images. I wiped them off my hard drive.

    I think it was sort of like my first cigarette puff as a kid…I thought, this isn’t even fun and it’s unhealthy. Not going to get hooked on this stuff.

    Today on the ‘net I see even legitimate web pages with click bait sidebar ads that aren’t even porn (I guess) but I bet porn is a mere click away from them.

    Thanks Ann for your educational post. I did not know about the heterosexual connection. That is sad indeed.

    Thank God I live a reclusive life.

  65. TheVeiledThreat says:

    Well. She did mention the push to declare “it” a “natural” method of contraception.

    Its acceptance by women is most demeaning.

  66. Richard W Comerford says:

    Ms. B:

    Well done. Thank you.

    God bless

    Richard W Comerford

  67. dymphna says:

    I suspect that a lot of it has to do with the AIDS propaganda in the 80s and 90s. It softened us up.
    The movies showed brave, suffering, noble homosexuals. The TV shows all had a AIDS character who was so much better than everyone else. Even the kids shows had AIDS episodes. None of the shows ever discussed how these people got AIDS but assured us that Kevin, and Chad were wonderful and just like you….

    I’m hearing single women complain that the men they meet are demanding anal sex on the first date. I always say, “Run. The guy is telling you something and you need to hear it.”

  68. Always Catholic Blog says:

    Ann has the guts Marines would die to have. I know, I’m the mother of a Marine who said so. This post is pure truth. Not accepting truth is just stupid. Huzzah, Ann.

  69. russellstjohn says:

    Ann, you have an amazing gift of frankness. And I say more power to you for tackling this subject. But I believe you may have overlooked something here. The 900 pound gorilla is not pornography, but instead something that preceded it,. i.e. contraception. That’s why the #Synod15 heretics are all fighting Humanae Vitae…still. Pornography would be powerless to attract without the normalization of #SterileSex. You said, “because they have been desensitized to it via pornography, which they are consuming at a staggering rate.” True, but again this is only true because the stigma of #SterileSex has all but vanished. My two cents worth.

Comments are closed.