Browse By

Pope Francis, the ‘Doctors of the Law’ and Jesus Christ

Brooklyn_Museum_-_Woe_unto_You,_Scribes_and_Pharisees_(Malheur_à_vous,_scribes_et_pharisiens)_-_James_Tissot

Who’s the pharisee? The ones who want to allow divorce. These are the words of Christ, that divorce was only allowed for the “hardness of heart” of the Jews, “but it was not so from the beginning”. “Mercy” … you keep on using that word…

His Holiness has been bashing those ‘Doctors of the Law’ again.

He’s very hard on the Jews, isn’t he, His Holiness? I do wish that, as well as warning us of “their yeast,” the Pope would remind his hearers that Jesus Christ was rebuking the Jewish leaders of His day, not the Christians who did and who would come to follow Him who have embraced Jesus’s teachings from the beginning of the Church.

The very Founder of the Catholic Church is Jesus Christ, and yes, He, Jesus Christ, indeed rebuked the Jewish leaders during His Earthly Ministry, but at no time did Our Lord rebuke them for their stubborn insistence that…

a) marriage is between one man and one woman and that no other such union could possibly exist.

b) marriage is a lifelong union of one man and one woman, ordered towards procreation within a sacred union that is indissoluble.

c) homosexual acts are acts of grave depravity, or morally disordered or contrary to nature and such ‘unions’ are gravely sinful.

Here is an irony His Holiness overlooks. On all of a), part of b) and all of c) the Pharisees and Jesus Christ will, ironically, have been in complete agreement. Pope Francis, however, is not addressing Jews but Christians and must know that his words today do not exist in a vacuum but they are timed to perfection within the veritable cauldron of the Synod on the Family.

Unfortunately, His Holiness never mentions that far from rebuking the Jews of His day for observing the union of marriage, rather Our Lord rebuked them for not doing so and for claiming to uphold the Law of God when, in fact, they did not. One way in which many did not was by not ‘going the whole way’ in terms of the covenant that is marriage.

‘And there came to him the Pharisees tempting him, and saying: Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?’

And then came the answer. We know the answer. They did not like it. They were told their “hardness of heart” led them to divorce and to permit it, even to extol it.

True it is that Jesus Christ condemned them for their lack of mercy, their self-righteousness and their lack of compassion but not for their religious, if stingy, beliefs on the basics of human marriage. Nor did he condemn what we can assume were their natural feelings on homosexuality, because, remember, the Second Person of the Trinity, with the First and the Third, destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah with fire in the Eternal

He Who is the One True God.

Not only did they not uphold the moral law in its beauty and truth, but they obsessed, not even over God’s commandments, but rather over man-made laws, or, in Jesus’s words, ‘human traditions’ that served only to hinder their fidelity to God, their love of God and love of neighbour. They didn’t obsess over Jesus’s commandments or His Teachings. They didn’t like much His marital teaching. Even the Apostles asked Him again.

Those Pharisees, those ‘Doctors of the Law’ needed a Saviour, but they did not believe they needed Jesus, while here was the Saviour standing before them. They called themselves teachers, yet here was the Divine Teacher Himself standing before them and they, Jewish leaders, not Christian Popes and Bishops, rejected Him and had Him crucified. That might not sound ‘PC’ but that is what the Gospels record.

And more than this, the Pharisees were angered, yes really very offended indeed, by Our Lord’s insistence that “what God has joined together, let no man put asunder,” presumably because among them they themselves had abused the law of Moses and had put away their first wives and remarried according to their own, perhaps not-so-holy desires.

Jesus Christ insisted that Moses permitted divorce only because of their ‘hardness of heart’.

Ouch! Now someone greater than Moses was there, standing before them: Jesus Christ, the Son of Man and the Son of God and He was to make “all things new.”

St John the Baptist: “I defended the sanctity of marriage and all I got was my head cut off…”

Jesus Christ commended, publicly, St John the Baptist who was martyred for upholding God’s vision of marriage, over man’s debasement of it and for condemning the sins of Herod.

As for homosexuality, it is notable that Jesus Christ spoke little of it because if adultery was shameful during His Earthly Ministry, just take that and multiply it by a thousand for today’s enduring cause for the promotion and defence of the right to sodomy.

Of course, when it comes to interpreting His Holiness’s homilies nowadays the key is simple: for “Pharisees and Scribes/Doctors of the Law” just insert “faithful Catholics” or “followers of Christ”. After all, it is Kasper and his followers who are bending to “human traditions,” not faithful Catholics. Jesus Christ’s relationship with the Pharisees is not as simplistic as His Holiness would try to convince us that it was.

Jesus did not condemn them for loving the Law of God, but, far from it, for not loving it or rather He Who gave it. He said to them: ‘But I know you, that you have not the love of God in you.’

For over two years now, we have heard this strange message, with little to no teaching on the dignity and sanctity of marriage and the family, which has become really the message of the Synod, from Pope Francis – and it is one exemplified by his own – for they are truly his own – “law-destroying laws” promulgated in his Motu Proprio on marriage annulments.

Perhaps Francis’ reasoning could be summed up conveniently, thus…

  • Jesus hates all laws, even the Ten Commandments,
  • even those commandments He gave to His Apostles, whom He told to teach all nations all the commandments He had given them,
  • even those teachings He Himself gave,
  • even on marriage, because they just interfere with His free love and mercy.
  • But He loves my nice new invented human laws,
  • He loves my annulments idea
  • and the Kasper proposal
  • because…er… Mercy!
  • because the Jubilee Year of Mercy expects this sign of humble obedience on the part of the Church’s shepherds … to the Spirit … who speaks to them through me, Francis…
  • because Pope!

 

Collegiality? No need for a Synod on the Climate, for Peter has spoken with authority…

But here’s the uncomfortable (for modern people) reality:

  • God made them male and female.
  • God ordained marriage.
  • God sanctifies marriage.
  • God commanded that married couples be holy and live married until death.
  • God commanded that we do not commit adultery.
  • God said that anyone who divorces and remarries commits adultery.
  • God said, ‘Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at hand’.

Whatever Francis says or does during and after this Synod, the Pope is not God. Please allow me to say it again: The pope is not God. He cannot, therefore, introduce any new teaching.

Jesus Christ and His Teachings cannot be improved upon. Either the Church gathers with Jesus Christ as its Lord and with those who bravely re-iterate His teachings, or it is shattered and scattered into anarchy and chaos.

Praise be to Our Lord Jesus Christ. May He make our faith in Him and His Word as solid as a rock.

 

~

17 thoughts on “Pope Francis, the ‘Doctors of the Law’ and Jesus Christ”

  1. Pingback: Where we’re going from here: Forward! Always forward! | What's Up With Synod-Church?
  2. Trackback: Where we’re going from here: Forward! Always forward! | What's Up With Synod-Church?
  3. Louise says:

    “b) marriage is a lifelong union of one man and one woman, ordered towards procreation within a sacred union that is indissoluble.”

    Yes. Also, Jesus did not call those Pharisees with lots of children, “rabbits.”

  4. Louise says:

    “I do wish that, as well as warning us of “their yeast,” the Pope would remind his hearers that Jesus Christ was rebuking the Jewish leaders of His day, not the Christians who did and who would come to follow Him who have embraced Jesus’s teachings from the beginning of the Church.”

    It’s a small point, but kind of important.

  5. Dawg_em says:

    This:

    “One must obey the commandments and do what Jesus said to do, Pope Francis insisted, but this is “my response” to God’s offer of salvation, not a condition for it.”

    Then this:

    “The commandments must be observed, the Pope said, but it is important to remember that they are summarised as “love God and love your neighbour.”

    So now I’m confused. I understand the love of God is given freely, and there’s nothing I can do about it. But is salvation also given freely? “My response…is not a condition for it”, and yet “the commandments must be observed”. Is Pope Francis a Protestant or a Catholic?

  6. catholicguy says:

    They have the little finger of Peter employed in the plot.

  7. Two2trees says:

    We have recently heard the gospel of Judas Iscariot (Gospel of John, ch 10) and now hear something akin to a gospel of Herod. John the Baptist was beheaded for upholding the sacred character of marriage. Can we expect much better for its current defenders?

  8. bigfred says:

    Uh oh… not quite the Bring it! commenting as advertised in the Commenting Policy. It should be reworded to something like so: Welcome to the anti-Francis Resistance! We are taking on the awesome power of a deranged and manipulative pope along with his powerful admirers in the cultural and governmental establishment. However, the Resistance will be fully moderated. Please allow up to 24 hours for your stalwart assaults on the battlements to appear.

    … because blog owner!

    P.S. Have a nice little day.

  9. bigfred says:

    Nice picture of Jorge being schooled by the Elder Brothers. Like a sponge.

  10. Chloe says:

    Lawrence, you go from strength to strength. Keep up the good work please.

  11. Barbara says:

    Yes, I like your phrase: language is used not as a tool to throw light on a subject, but rather as a smoke-screen to hide an agenda.

    Neat that Jesus is The Word.

  12. bosco49 says:

    Well articulated, Bones.

    “Many false prophets will arise, and many will be deceived by them; and the charity of most men will grow cold, as they see wickedness abound everywhere; but that man will be saved who endures to the last. This gospel of the kingdom must first be preached all over the world, so that all nations may hear the truth; only after that will the end come.” Matthew 24: 11-14

    The Catholic Catechism states at 1822:

    “Charity is the theological virtue by which we love God above all things for his own sake, and our neighbour as ourselves for the love of God.”

    “Fruit of the Spirit and fullness of the Law, charity keeps the commandments of God and his Christ: ‘Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love’.” 1824

    “Charity is superior to all the virtues. It is the first of the theological virtues: ‘So faith, hope, charity abide, these three. But the greatest of these is charity’.” 1826

    “The practice of all the virtues is animated and inspired by charity, which ‘binds everything together in perfect harmony’…” 1827

    “The fruits of charity are joy, peace, and mercy; charity demands beneficence and fraternal correction;…” 1829

    May I suggest that because certain elements in the Church hierarchy, Bergolio not excepted, see wickedness abounding, by failing to love their neighbour for the love of God and His commandments, their Charity has grown cold as they sanction sin rather than offer fraternal correction to the erring. If true charity binds everything together in perfect harmony, the lack of charity brings about chaos and alienation from God.

    And “after that will the end will come.” The choice for faithful Catholics being either “¡Vaya lío!” or “Maranatha”.

  13. MenAreLikeWine says:

    Well said Mr Bones

  14. MSApis says:

    Very well thought out. Thank you for exposing the intellectual sleight of hand that is taking place at the Synod, where language is used not as a tool to throw light on a subject, but rather as a smoke-screen to hide an agenda.

  15. Guest says:

    Every time this man opens his mouth I think not too pleasant things. We’re like the Jews before the Babylonian captivity, where the spiritual leaders are asses and apostates.

  16. VSimmons says:

    Mr. England, very well said. It is so important for Catholics to remember that the pope is not God as this is what the rest of the world thinks that we think about the pope. I have explained this so many times I’ve lost count and yet people still believe it. Thank you for such a well written article.

  17. Two2trees says:

    Well put. God bless you!

  18. PompousMaximus says:

    Thank you. I sure needed this.

Comments are closed.